[Dylan16807]

> werent willing to pay for an SLA

According to who?

> no promises were made in writing

Most big businesses won't promise anything. That doesn't make their actions reasonable.

> Why would they intentionally lose money

You made this up.

Also if they were losing money on some feature, they could change the quota for just that feature.

[MichaelZuo]

Are you confused?

Clearly I was not asking for random role play on how another HN user may answer a direct question.

[Dylan16807]

I'm calling out your "questions" as containing a bunch of unsupported claims about the situation on top of weird assumptions about how things have to work. It was not an answer, and your questions as written don't deserve answers.

[MichaelZuo]

How can your opinion even outweigh anyone else’s in the first place?

From what I can see there is no possible way your opinions could have some extra weight, above and beyond the median HN user.

(And in either case, you still seem confused for trying to initially hide behind some weird pretense reply)

[Dylan16807]

> opinion

It's not an opinion-based claim. Maybe I missed something that would make me incorrect, but whether you made up details that make OP look bad is a factual matter. It's true or it isn't.

Also I said nothing about my opinion "outweighing" anyone else. Where did you get that from?

> hide behind some weird pretense

I'm sorry if it came off that way. I wasn't going for any weird pretense, and don't think most people would read the comment that way.

[MichaelZuo]

> It's not an opinion-based claim.

This sentence is literally an opinion.

Take your nonsense elsewhere, it’s totally derailling the thread.

[Dylan16807]

> This sentence is literally an opinion.

I could disagree but it doesn't matter. I said a particular thing was not an opinion. You pointing at something else I said and calling it an opinion doesn't affect my claims at all.

What matters is my claim that you made up stuff about _drg9's situation. That claim is objectively true or false, not an opinion. And the evidence I see all says the claim is true.

> Take your nonsense elsewhere, it’s totally derailling the thread.

Derailing what? Nobody else has posted in this part of the comments in days.