Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by mixmastamyk 140 days ago
That’s interesting, how does hard-to-fire law combine with a company that needs to have layoffs?
2 comments

Hard-to-fire typically means only specific and provable reasons are valid.

"Shrinking the org" is a valid reason.

I guess it works for companies which are not part of the union?
"The union" should be "a union", of which, companies are rarely a part of ie zero. Their workforce may be a member of a union, some equals in grade may belong to different unions.
Thank you for your generous correction but you could rather address the point I was trying to make.