[hirako2000]

Just me or does sit well to monetize _mostly_ off the core benefits of an open source application?

Can't be easy to build a GUI on top, but I'm sure a 10% revenue to be redistributed to the hero behind jj would go a long way. Would also pay off.

[throwatdem12311]

There is nothing about neither the licensing of jj or the spirit of open source that stigmatizes this.

[hirako2000]

Nothing against, I agree.

[Valodim]

The hero behind jj is employed by Google afaik, so we're good.

[misnome]

10% revenue to google?

[surajrmal]

While the primary maintainer is a Google employee, the majority of commits and committers are not. It's decidedly not a Google project.

[3eb7988a1663]

I mean the Google CLA kind of says otherwise.

[surajrmal]

Fair point, I thought it had been eliminated, but apparently that is pending the adoption of the project by a foundation such as Apache or the Linux foundation.

[hirako2000]

Touché