|
|
|
|
|
by JoshTriplett
135 days ago
|
|
And? Presentation of someone else's valid credentials is not fixable by any privacy-preserving mechanism. You can set an expiration date in order to rotate them, and they can be fast-rotating. In any case, it's a moot point: the correct amount of required identification is zero. |
|
And that is precisely why governments will never implement a privacy-preserving mechanism, which is exactly my point.
Compromised tokens would be trivially google-able within a day otherwise.