[mindslight]

Wut? You do realize that being in the presence of law enforcement officers is much different than the situation of being actively assaulted by them, right?

For example, the other day I interacted with a few police officers in person by virtue of being tangentially-involved with a car crash. I laughed and joked with them, then went about my business. But if they had instead been surrounding me with guns drawn, it would have taken me the rest of the day to come down from that.

[kreetx]

When driving towards a law enforcement officer, it is you assaulting them, not the other way around. Fleeing is against the law as well. Why did the woman attempt this? Ot, if it was so dangerous, what was she doing there?

[mindslight]

"As I said, you're starting at a point where the ICE agent had already set up his pretext to execute her."

You keep coming back to this point in time, to the exclusion of everything that led up to it. Why?

[kreetx]

Because the alledged pretext assumes being able to predict the future.

[mindslight]

Are you claiming it is impossible for an ICE agent to think "I'm just going to shoot the next person who tries to drive away" or what?

[kreetx]

Planning ahead to put your own health at risk?

[mindslight]

That's a weird way to frame the perspective of someone whose primary job responsibility is physical aggression. It's also not too hard to jump out of the way of a vehicle that you're focusing on if it starts moving. The argument you're effectively making is that the agent's positioning was entirely non-deliberate, even though he had been dragged by a car previously.