[grayhatter]

> So obviously they don't think it's safe to use broadly.

More likely, everything gets added to the list because there shouldn't be false positives, it's worth investigating to make sure there isn't an adjacent gap in the security systems.

[kulahan]

You are uploading information to the chat system every time you use it. Doubly true if you’re having it analyze or work with documents.

I presume pulling this data out is simple if you’re, say, China.

There really no security to investigate. Without a private instance, it’s an absolute non-starter for anything classified.

[patrickmcnamara]

> presume pulling this data out is simple if you’re, say, China

Why would you presume that?

[dmbche]

A nationstate has a lot of capacity to do things they shouldn't be doing

[kulahan]

Because this is a discussion about national security.