|
|
|
|
|
|
by zxcvasd
147 days ago
|
|
|
to any non-cryptographer, i think that's a distinction without a difference. it's disallowed from use by the major standards institute due to a vulnerability where people can recover the plain text. that sounds "broken" to me, but i'm not a cryptographer. so, i'll defer to you when you say it's not broken. (i dont know what the cryptographer-specific definition of broken is -- it'd be great if you would shed some light on that) |
|
|