|
|
|
|
|
|
by foldr
137 days ago
|
|
|
> The code is not thread-safe as, if multiple threads attempt to use this lock, we could read invalid values of isLocked (in theory, and on a CPU where tearing could happen on its word size). The issue isn’t just tearing but also memory order. On some architectures you can read a valid but out of date value in Thread A after Thread B has updated that value. (Memory order is mentioned later in the article, to be fair.) |
|
|