[fooker]

> easiest

This is the keyword here, just because the other approach is harder does not mean it is impossible.

It's a decent gamble to try and do things the hard way if it is possible to be deployed on cheaper/smaller hardware (eg: no lidars, just cameras).

[fancyfredbot]

Is it still a decent gamble after you've been trying (and failing) for a decade, and numerous well funded competitors are going the easy way, and when there is huge upside to being first, and when the value of FSD easily covers the rapidly falling cost of LIDAR?

No. It's not a good idea. It's not a good gamble. It's stupid, and the engineers can see it's stupid. A lot of them have quit, reducing the very slim chances of it working even further.

[FL33TW00D]

But why is FSD "failing" is the key question.

Hint: it's not the sensor inputs that are the bottleneck!

[fooker]

Yeah you could be right.

Not my area of expertise, so I’d rather not try to predict what will work and what won’t.