|
|
|
|
|
|
by RetroTechie
140 days ago
|
|
|
> Still amazes me how much we did with only 512MB. Or the other way around: still amazes me how many GBs today's machines need to do conceptually simple things. Things that were done ages ago (successfully, if not better) on much, much, much lower-powered kit. Never mind CPU speed. Eg. GUIs have been done on machines with a few 100s Kbytes of RAM. 'Only 512MB' is already >1000x that. |
|
|