[garciasn]

I didn't twist anything. If anything, I would argue YOU are twisting words of the original comment to which I responded:

>> the United States government rolling through protesters in armored vehicles

> I'm sorry, did I miss something? Is this something that's happened (ever)?

[elcritch]

No I was referring to the original comment twisting words. They intentionally invoke the horrors of dictators running over protesters to disperse them.

Your comment showed the actual event, thanks. It showed an armored vehicle slowly pushing through protesters to gain access to something.

Not remotely comparable scenes, so I must assume intentional twisting of words. My comment was written sloppily.

[ryandrake]

It's the first three lines of the Narcissists Prayer[1]

    That didn't happen.
    And if it did, it wasn't that bad.
    And if it was, that's not a big deal...

1: https://www.thelifedoctor.org/the-narcissist-s-prayer

[garciasn]

I honestly don't understand why you posted the Narcissist's Prayer; however, to clarify: the original comment I responded to referred to another comment that said, "the United States government rolling through protesters in armored vehicles," to which I replied, in part, "it's a video of a WCCO news (local MSP TV station) segment which shows an armored vehicle pushing protesters out of the way."

The person who said I was twisting words said (emphasis mine), "There’s an enormous difference between driving slowly through a crowd of protestors with no injuries versus running over protesters with a tank."

At no point did I nor the comment I responded to use the words, 'running over protesters with a tank'.

[ryandrake]

No, no, no--you're the one who's right. The others are running with the "prayer."

"United States government rolling through protesters in armored vehicles"

"Did this really happen?"

You: Video of it actually happening.

Response: Yea, but that video didn't show them "running over protesters with a tank"

[garciasn]

Got it; thank you for the clarification.