|
|
|
|
|
by perching_aix
143 days ago
|
|
> The shame is not that much that he was so imbecile to not have appropriate backups These comments vehemently disagree: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46726570 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46777039 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46777123 > ... (the rest) ... It's not that I don't see or even agree with concerns around the misuse and defrauding angle to this, it's that it's blatantly clear to me that's not why the many snarky comments are so snarky. It's also not as if I was magically immune to such behavioral reflexes either, it's really just regrettable. Though I will say, it's also pretty clear to me that many taking issue with the misuse angle do not seem to think that any amount or manner of AI use can be responsible or acceptable, rendering all use of it misuse - that is not something agree with. |
|
A reasonable amount of AI use is certainly acceptable, where "reasonable" depends on the situation, for any academic related job this amount should be close to zero, and no material produced by any student/grad/researcher/professor should be fed to third party LLM models without explicit consent, otherwise what even is the point? Regurgitating slop is not academic work.