|
|
|
|
|
by nemo1618
147 days ago
|
|
Here's one attempt: https://x.com/sigilante/status/2013743578950873105 My take: Any gains from an "LLM-oriented language" will be swamped by the massive training set advantage held by existing mainstream languages. In order to compete, you would need to very rapidly build up a massive corpus of code examples in your new language, and the only way to do that is with... LLMs. Maybe it's feasible, but I suspect that it simply won't be worth the effort; existing languages are already good enough for LLMs to recursively self-improve. |
|