[JCattheATM]

> Just simple logic!

It's simple "logic", for sure.

> Instead you’re just openly declaring your own inability/unwillingness to assess information quality, and being proud of it?

That's your interpretation, which is far from reality. I think the big difference here is you put way more value on polls than is warranted. It's not like you've provided a ton of sources, either.

I likely won't be relying to you further, as I don't see the point. Cheers.