|
|
|
|
|
by cobolexpert
138 days ago
|
|
I was also thinking this some days ago. The scaffolding that static languages provide is a good fit for LLMs in general. Interestingly, since we are talking about Go specifically, I never found that I was spending too much typing... types. Obviously more than with a Python script, but never at a level where I would consider it a problem. And now with newer Python projects using type annotations, the difference got smaller. |
|
Just FWIW, you don't actually have to put type annotations in your own code in order to use annotated libraries.