|
|
|
|
|
by chrisjj
140 days ago
|
|
It literally is your point "enforcing a condition for one party to have Id of other for age verification etc". As for the provider, there is not prhibition on communicating with him, with or without ID. Just on him providing service to other than verifed adults. |
|
Oh okay yea I don't mean that exactly but from my original comment what I meant was that the service of VPN is still essentially just a communication layer of sorts between two devices where a middle man can sit technically.
I was referring to this as still a communication creating a network between these two vis a vis VPN
And they are having restrictions on VPN's, my point of fear in this context is that suppose I host anything between two computers, technically its still a VPN (think a proxy or even a VPS or even cf tunnels alternative or heck even my self hosted tmate)
My point is that they are all still technically VPN's and this rule can still apply. I don't think that they can refer to VPN as wireguard or something as we imagine and this gives immense power to them
It's absolutely scary to say the least.