[nuc1e0n]

Medical ethics boards already do such things don't they?

[kelseyfrog]

You're confused. Maybe do some research on ethics boards?

[nuc1e0n]

If you think so, what sources would you recommend? According to Wikipedia on medical ethics, "These values include the respect for autonomy". Not expecting any level of self control doesn't show respect for autonomy IMHO.

[kelseyfrog]

The AMA Principles of Medical Ethics[1] is a good starting point.

Principle nine reads as;

> IX. A physician shall support access to medical care for all people.

I can't in good conscious find withholding care due to the value of personal responsibility with supporting access to medical care for all people.

1. https://code-medical-ethics.ama-assn.org/principles

[nuc1e0n]

Interesting. I'll look into that. The Hippocratic oath says that a physician should do no harm (ἐπὶ δηλήσει δὲ καὶ ἀδικίῃ εἴρξειν). It's a personal value judgement as to whether some intervention is providing medical care or causing harm. I consider reckless genetic modification to be causing harm.

[gizmo686]

> The Hippocratic oath says that a physician should do no harm

No it doesn't. Such a standard would make the practice of medicine impossible, as all treatments have some risk of harm.

What is relevant to this discussion is the below excerpt of the modern form of the oath:

> I will apply, for the benefit of the sick, all measures which are required, avoiding those twin traps of overtreatment and therapeutic nihilism.