|
|
|
|
|
by ajcp
148 days ago
|
|
-> and make it happen. I think OPs point is they failed on this part. "Making it happen" should have been ensuring a compliant and approved version of the software was the one made available to the developers.
At a large scale that is done via device management, but even at a medium sized enterprise that should have been done via a source management portal of some sort. |
|
I’ve consulted at some places that should have been licensing Dicker Desktop and I just skipped the workflow headaches and used Rancher from the start with the compatibility aliases installed. A lot of places are simply unaware.