|
|
|
|
|
by rtbruhan00
146 days ago
|
|
We implemented an AI-powered customer support triage system that initially looked promising in testing. In production, it actually increased our support costs by ~30% because: The AI would confidently misroute 15-20% of tickets, requiring human review of ALL AI decisions
and the Customers lost trust after a few bad experiences and started explicitly requesting human agents
also Support agents spent more time correcting AI mistakes than they saved The breaking point was data quality - our training data was too clean compared to real customer queries. We ended up rolling back to rule-based routing with AI as an optional suggestion tool instead. |
|
When you rolled back, did you keep AI as suggestions only + rules-based routing? And what metric exposed it fastest for you: recontact rate, handle time, or escalation to humans?