[littlecranky67]

This. We must change laws that the above field is not considered as given consent. And while we are at it, we must change "silence is agreement" to "silence is disagreement". This applies to change of ToS, price increases etc. That means if I don't click a link with a button "I agree", the ToS change is not accepted - that means they have to cancel/delete my account.

[bayindirh]

Didn't FCC remove "1-click unsubscribe" requirement since it can "provide more choice and lower prices to all users across the board" (since the companies can rip off more users and create pseudo-lower prices)?

EU has its GPDR and it has some teeth, but US is currently hopeless on that front, for now, from my vantage point.

I'd love to be stand corrected though.

[SpicyLemonZest]

The FTC established a "click-to-cancel" rule, but (as with just so many regulations in the US) it was blocked by an appeals court. Federal law says there's a hoop they have to jump through for rules with an impact of more than $100 million, and they didn't jump through the hoop because they didn't think the impact was that high.

[7bit]

Just move to Germany, we have all you asked for.

[littlecranky67]

No we don't. Banks yes, but outside of banking no one respects this.

[lelanthran]

> And while we are at it, we must change "silence is agreement" to "silence is disagreement".

Maybe we should reframe their "silence is agreement" message as "silence is consent".

[pluralmonad]

So creepy and weird this comment has downvotes. These people/companies absolutely do not value nor care about consent.