Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by mopsi 148 days ago 

  > If you look at old interviews of Putin
Yes, let's do that: https://x.com/adnashmyash/status/1977146505900573089

  2008: "Crimea is not disputed territory of Ukraine, and the issues of Russian speakers are internal issues of Ukraine."

  2013: "Russia certainly doesn't plan to send troops into Ukraine."

  2014: "After the annexation of Crimea, Russia doesn't plan to further divide Ukraine."

  2019: "It's nonsense that Russia plans to attack anyone in future."

  2022: "Russia's Special Military Operation does not involve the occupation of Ukrainian territories."

  2023: "The conflict in Ukraine is not a territorial conflict — we have plenty of own territories."

  2024: "Anyone who wants Russia to give up CONQUERED TERRITORIES in Ukraine must understand that this is impossible."
1 comments
4gotunameagain 148 days ago
Your comment contradicts nothing from my argument. Of course the rhetoric changed as the situation changed.

It is silly to think that the largest country of the world needed a couple of ukrainian villages.

Unfortunately - and I know that you will disagree - even if Putin was the one that invaded, I place the blame on Ukraine and NATO.

link
mopsi 148 days ago 

  > Of course the rhetoric changed as the situation changed.
Blaming NATO is just another such rhetoric, put forward because it is the most advantageous in the current situation. It activates fools who begin self-flagellation, and in the process, disrupt military aid to Ukraine, which helps the Russian war effort.

Even among Russians who can be considered serious experts, no one takes the "blame NATO" narrative seriously. It's an excuse. A pretext. Look up Hitler's speeches from early September 1939 and you will see similar rhetoric about Germany being surrounded by the Franco-British alliance, with Poland as its spearhead. The similarity is uncanny, because it follows a standard pattern of excuses used by aggressors: portraying themselves as threatened, framing their actions as defensive, and blaming external forces for the conflicts they themselves initiate.

link
4gotunameagain 148 days ago
Again, your comment is full of emotionally fuelled words, and no substance or refutation of my points.

I am honestly sorry your country has been invaded (you seem to be Ukrainian). But I would much rather have peace at the cost of Ukrainian territory, than continuous escalation and geopolitical rifts, at the cost of Ukrainian lives and risking an even larger conflict in Europe.

It was a mistake to let Ukraine be courted by the west.

link