|
|
|
|
|
|
by nandomrumber
151 days ago
|
|
|
> The only asterisk this time is that this is electricity, not energy. … and 7.8% for Europe. Yes, the _!ONLY!_ thing is, this won’t move the needle at all on climate change. Wind and solar for electric is the lowest of low hanging fruit. No one has even proposed that they have maybe even possibly have perhaps thought of an idea to address transport and agriculture related emissions. Lithium ion batteries, or a solid state alternative aren’t it. Not without being some orders of magnitude more energy dense and lighter. And you still need to electrify those sectors to be able to charge the batteries. |
|
|
Public transport is almost completely electric powered where I live (ferries still haven't changed to electric, but it's coming.)
Trucking is electrified, as in, the operators have realzed that they're cheaper to run, so they are changing over when possible. (Sidenote: with some of the heaviest loads worldwide)
Very many agricultural buildings in active use either have, or are installing solar. Their energy usage is so high, that any offset to it is "free" money. Many have installed batteries also, so if there is an interruption in power delivery, there isn't an immediate need to start up a generator.
Electric tractors are also something I've heard them want. Less maintenance means less time spent not being able to work.
Sure, fertilizer and animal husbandry have other emissions which aren't tackled by this, but why exclude improvement just because some other area isn't affected.