[yohguy]

I don't like reading AI text because I feel each word matters a lot less, however the message the author is conveying can be preserved. I read an article like this for the quality of the message not the craftsmen of the medium.

[mpalmer]

If the author didn't have the good taste and decency to edit the painfully obvious generated text, I just assume the message is low quality.

[AstroBen]

This is the new world we live in. Writers use AI to balloon a 2 paragraph thought into a full article, readers then use AI to compress the article into something akin to a 2 paragraph easily digestible piece. Everyone much happy. Example:

Key points from The Human in the Loop..

- The author pushes back on the idea that AI has made software developers obsolete, arguing instead that it has shifted where human effort matters.

- AI is increasingly good at producing code quickly, but that doesn’t remove the need for human oversight—especially for correctness, security, edge cases, and architectural fit.

- The “human in the loop” is not a temporary bottleneck but the accountable party who must understand, review, and take responsibility for what ships.

- Senior engineers’ most valuable skill has always been judgment, not typing speed—and AI makes that judgment even more critical.

- The author warns against blaming AI for bugs or bad outcomes; responsibility still lies with the human who approved the result.

- Software practices, team structures, and workflows need to evolve to emphasize review, verification, and intent over raw code production.