[snvzz]

>Name how it's possible to improve security on X11 without breakig changes.

Namespaces. It's been done already. Look into XLibre.

>Lunduke made factually wrong claims for hype.

Citation needed.

>His mob are keen to attack Open Source developers.

Doesn't own a mob, and never happened. Horrible accusation, by the way.

[sergeykish]

Once you enable XLibre namespaces filtering it breaks screensharing, global hotkeys. Obviously. It is breaking change.

> Doesn't own a mob, and never happened. Horrible accusation, by the way.

Mob unable to response on technical question. To use logic.

> Citation needed.

His YouTube comment section speaks volumes. He manipulates technically uneducated.

[snvzz]

> Once you enable XLibre namespaces filtering it breaks screensharing, global hotkeys. Obviously. It is breaking change.

Ah, the classic moving of goalposts.

I'll bite: It is far from impossible, and already solved elsewhere: Most applications do not need such functionality.

For those that do, provide mechanisms to request and facilitate access to such functionality when needed. Like portals do for other functionality. And a wrapper to request automatically for e.g. old binaries without source.

> (further slander on Lunduke and community)

Uncool.

[sergeykish]

API is contract. API grants access to screen content, key presses. Users blame Wayland for breaking this contract. Both Wayland and XLibre namespaces brake it. Lunduke mob unable to reason, claims "moving goalposts". Lunduke mob claims improving security is not needed. Lunduke mod wants Linux desktop to be malware can. They claim security improvements for everyone (like defaults on Android) is corporations taking away their freedom. Lunduke mob unable to comprehend Wayland started by XOrg developers who knew X11 flaws. They unable to be thankful for people bringing security to modern expectations.