|
|
|
|
|
by timschmidt
154 days ago
|
|
Good question. Canada has twice as many registered firearms as the US (though the number of unregistered firearms is likely greater in the US). It's certainly not difficult to purchase guns in either country. And Canada experiences an order of magnitude fewer gun deaths per capita than the US. The US is somewhat unique among western nations in how it handles mental illness, and crime, and I would suggest those are more fruitful avenues of inquiry. So I'll stand by the stance that individuals are responsible for their own actions, that tools cannot bear responsibility for how they are used on account of being inanimate objects, and that all tools serve constructive and destructive purposes, sometimes simultaneously. |
|
and since the US handles guns so lax they are a problem
a vocal minority is making a lot of problems (but the US is not even enforcing its existing gun control laws sufficiently)
individuals are responsible, but that doesn't mean that the tool is not a significant factor.
and hence the recommendation is to have better control of who gets the tool (and not emotionally charged "scary rifle" ban)