|
|
|
|
|
by leptons
147 days ago
|
|
>I said "it wasn't the cash cow it once was". And that is wrong. It's even better than the "cash cow" it used to be, I provided some values of what Windows brings in over the years, and it has grown and grown. You ignored that. >I understand what it means fine. I did use it correctly. You seriously do not. >You are a clown. You are reported. |
|
No and I've never ignored it. As the revenue percentage decreases because it is growing slow. It will become less important.
Relatively it isn't as much of a cash cow, which I explained ad-nauseam to you.
> You seriously do not.
It is correct enough for all intents and purposes. You are quibbling over semantics. It is totally unnecessary and pedantic.
> You are reported.
I don't care. If you make arrogant little statements like that, expect that response.