[_heimdall]

> It is almost impossible to escape the constant barrage of takes and news headlines these days without being a total luddite

Its odd to me to still use "luddite" disparagingly while implying that avoiding certain tech would actually have some high impact benefits. At that point I can't help but think the only real issue with being a luddite is not following the crowd and fitting in.

[spicyusername]

I didn't use it disparagingly.

In fact, it's easier than ever to see the intended benefit of such a lifestyle.

[_heimdall]

Fair enough! I must have just misread you then, I'm too used to see it described as a bad thing.

[dugidugout]

Which also has a term with stigma: hipster

[pousada]

Hipster used to mean that but meaning changed to being someone who “doesn’t fit in” but only for performative reasons, not really “for real” but just to project an image of how cool they are

[dugidugout]

Alas, something something capitalism.

[KPGv2]

> Its odd to me to still use "luddite" disparagingly while implying that avoiding certain tech would actually have some high impact benefits

They didn't say to avoid certain tech. They said to avoid takes and news headlines.

Your conflation of those two is like someone saying "injecting bleach into your skin is bad" and you responding with "oh, so you oppose cleaning bathrooms [with bleach]?"

[_heimdall]

How so? The OP referenced how difficult it is to avoid said takes and news without being a complete luddite. That certainly implies avoiding certain tech, I have to assume they meant much of the digital tech we use today rather than the power loom luddites were pushing back on.

Your bleach scenario is confusing to me, its also you arguing against something completely unrelated to the discussion here.