[lcnPylGDnU4H9OF]

> Who here has said anything of substance in response to anything I've said?

What have you written that is substantive? It appears your comments in this thread are all meta descriptions of themselves. That is what I refer to as a "psychological projection".

[BuckRogers]

I said more of substance here than you for sure. At least I had a point. You’re just attacking the messenger. Totally useless.

[lcnPylGDnU4H9OF]

> I said more of substance here than you for sure. At least I had a point.

Your comments do not make any substantive points. One observation with regard to this is that, when asked for anything you've written in this thread that is substantive, you write only that it exists rather than offering said substance for review.

> You’re just attacking the messenger.

My comments are not about you but instead about the things you've posted and your seeming behavior while doing so. I have no quarrel with you.

[BuckRogers]

Wow, talk about projecting.