|
|
|
|
|
by rpiguy
149 days ago
|
|
Of course it was in our interests to do so. No empire acts otherwise. We do not own the world, but we do own the worlds reserve currency, largest economy, are the guarantors of safe naval passage for most of the world, are the defenders of North America, Europe, and to a lesser extent Japan and South Korea. We send re-usable rockets to space. We are amazing. Does any of this give us a direct claim to Greenland? No, but what claim did Denmark have over the native people when they invaded? Roosevelt honestly thought the Soviets would be good partners post-war. He was wrong. Very wrong. |
|
If you really are American then I hope the irony of this question is not lost on you.
I guess talking to you is kinda like talking to a citizen of Germany circa 1939 who is saying that of course Poland should be taken, they have the best location in Europe with all trade between east and west going throught it, lots of natural resources, and after all why do the Slavs have claims to it, Prussians lived there too. I don't want to see my country collapse militarily and economically - and we are amazing too. Not the mention large portion of Poland was under German control during the 100 year long partition of Poland, surely they need to pay back for all the great stuff that we built there for them.
It just makes sense, doesn't it. America is powerful, of course it should take Greenland if it wants to - why shouldn't Denmark give it away, they owe you, right?
I suppose the only question is - are you ready to pick up a rifle and come and take it? Or just to send other young men do to it for you? Or is your plan just to destroy your alleged allies economically until they do what you want them to do?
I think my main regret at the moment is looking up to America as an adolescent, your cultural exports have really worked in that sense. You might have the best rockets around, but at the end of the day you're just a country of bullies.