|
|
|
|
|
by tbenst
4987 days ago
|
|
I strongly disagree with the negative sentiment expressed thus far in the comments. Understand, that when articles are hosted on the rapgenius.com domain, that the user base will mainly comment on allegories, make jokes, and explain vernacular. However, Law Genius, Bible Genius and other areas they expand to will be targeted to people working / following those domains: people with expertise to add valuable commentary. rapgenius.com (the site) proves the model of Rap Genius (the company). They were able to attract a critical mass of domain experts to explain rap music. Moreover, their SEO model works. Imagine if in a year a search for Brown v. Board gives you results for Wikipedia and Law Genius. Wikipedia summarizes and quotes. Law genius is a primary source that presumably will have annotations from domain experts. If properly executed, the Rap Genius model will enable a wider audience to deal with primary sources, leveraging crowd-sourced commenting to enable a person with little domain knowledge to understand the original document. |
|