|
|
|
|
|
by falconroar
148 days ago
|
|
Interesting, I wasn't aware; thanks for that. I will say, Polars' implementation is much more centered on out-of-core processing, and bypasses some of DuckDB's limitations ("DuckDB cannot yet offload some complex intermediate aggregate states to disk"). Both incredible pieces of software. To expand on this, Polars' `LazyFrame` implementation allows for simple addition of new backends like GPU, streaming, and now distributed computing (though it's currently locked to a vendor). The DuckDB codebase just doesn't have this flexibility, though there are ways to get it to run on GPU using external software. |
|
Being able to use distributed backends to process frames sounds kind of incredible, but I can't imagine my little projects ever making use of it. Still, very cool stuff.