[t0bia_s]

Would you follow AI generated news? Not me and I'm sure I'm not the only one.

If AI leads to decentralisation of press, it sounds better to me. We certainly do not need one or few big entities that follows political tendencies.

[greggoB]

Not if I can identify it, which I fear is going to become a harder task in the future.

> If AI leads to decentralisation of press, it sounds better to me.

Seems optimistic to me, given the trend with pretty much everything AI since ChatGPT was announced is concentrating as much power as possible in the hands of a few big tech companies.

As an added example: decentralization was a big promise of crypto; at present, hard for me to see how that's lived up to the promise. I don't see how the current trend with the hands of control over AI will work out any better in this regard.

[t0bia_s]

Local AI exist as well. It's just hard to measure it.

Whats wrong with crypto decentralisation?

[greggoB]

> Local AI exist as well. It's just hard to measure it.

Yeah but you're not going to get your news from local AI, are you? you have to connect it to the internet and look up news for you, but if a lot of what's found online is AI generated and there isn't a clear way to distinguish it, then how are you better off?

> Whats wrong with crypto decentralisation?

It hasn't really happened? To my knowledge, a large proportion of crypto volumes are going through a handful of centralised exchanges. Traditional finance sector is also increasing its presence/hold.

[t0bia_s]

I find consumption of AI generated news useless. My reaction was primarily for decentralisation of AI generated tools.

I don't have numbers for crypto but auctions are not only way to buy crypto. And they do not have power to regulate value. Isn't that a sign of decentralization?