[mikert89]

this isnt even true though. because if building software is so cheap, you wont be penalized for building the wrong thing. you just move onto the next

[SkiFire13]

You are assuming that the only downside of building a broken product are the development resources you spent in the process. That might be true for a new product, and only if it doesn't cause damage to your customers. For an established product that needs updates, breaking it means losing a lot of the value that was in that product.

[mbesto]

This is literally what happens all the time with startup, it's called "pivoting".

[mikert89]

What happens when you can pivot with a new fully built product once a month?

[mbesto]

Nothing. A month isn't enough to get valid feedback.

[mikert89]

I am patiently awaiting the collapse of traditional saas VC