|
|
|
|
|
by Esophagus4
150 days ago
|
|
I don’t think (could be wrong) the argument is don’t ban social media for children because we don’t ban it for adults… I think the argument is it is easier politically to regulate behavior of a population that doesn’t vote and is not us. English societies have a long history of regulating the behavior of others - see English Poor Laws. It’s an interesting perspective at least, I hadn’t thought of the social media ban in that way. I happen to think we should still ban bad things (smoking, drinking, gambling, and probably social media) for kids. But I appreciate the argument. |
|