|
|
|
|
|
by lelanthran
157 days ago
|
|
>> The hikikomori[1] or NEETs ought to be a hotbed of creative works if your hypothesis is true. And they aren't, plain and simple. > Chiming in as a former-ish member of the demographic you are just making stuff up about. Which bit is made up? Can we tell at all if that group is "a hotbed of creative works"? > A lot of these humans if given a no pressure handout of cash would likely contribute more to society. Would most not contribute? idk. But I do know that the contributions of those who would might offset all the others. "likely", "might" - this is all speculation on your part too. There is no reason to believe that a lot of humans if given a no pressure handout of cash would, in fact, contribute more to society, nor that the contributions from those that do would, in fact, offset those that don't. It's speculation on both sides of this particular argument I see no compelling evidence at all. |
|
If we can't tell, the "they aren't" bit is of course made up. Are you not arguing in good faith, or are you just not paying attention to what you're quoting?