|
|
|
|
|
by binarylogic
153 days ago
|
|
I agree with the framing. The goal isn't less data for its own sake. The goal is understanding your systems and being able to debug when things break. But here's the thing: most teams aren't drowning in data because they're being thorough. They're drowning because no one knows what's valuable and what's not. Health checks firing every second aren't helping anyone debug anything. Debug logs left in production aren't insurance, they're noise. The question isn't "can you do with less?" It's "do you even know what you have?" Most teams don't. They keep everything just in case, not because they made a deliberate choice, but because they can't answer the question. Once you can answer it, you can make real tradeoffs. Keep the stuff that matters for debugging. Cut the stuff that doesn't. |
|
"disk getting full" isn't useful unless you understand how/why it got full and that requires logging things that might or might matter to the problem.