Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by downsplat 158 days ago
I guess the point is that you're already doing it for postgres. You alrrady need persistent storage for your app, and the same engine can handle your queuing needs.
1 comments

Exactly, if you’re already doing it for Postgres and Postgres can do the job well enough to meet your requirements, you’re only adding more cost and complexity by deploying Redis too.