|
|
|
|
|
by themanmaran
151 days ago
|
|
Not the founder, but having run conversational agents at decent scale, I don't think the cost actually matters much early on. It's almost always better to pay more for the smarter model, than to potentially give a worse player experience. If they had 1M+ players there would certainly be room to optimize, but starting out you'd certainly spend more trying engineer the model switcher than you would save in token costs. |
|
Not only that but I think our selling point is rewarding creativity with emergent behavior. I think baked dialogue would turn into traditional game with worse writing pretty quick and then you got a problem. For example, this AI game here does multiple choices with a local model and people seem a bit mild about it.
We could use it to cache popular QA, but in my experience humans are insane and nobody ever says even remotely similar things to robots :)
[1] https://store.steampowered.com/app/2828650/The_Oversight_Bur...