[nobodywillobsrv]

What exactly was the bad stuff? He was insensitive about empirical reality or he was literally wrong about something in the sense of being very confident about something despite having little data? Or something else? I only remember the cartons really but was aware some people seemed to be irked about him recently.

[jimmydddd]

Some random internet poll said many people of race A agreed it was "not OK" to be a person of race B. Adams said if that were true, then people of race B should probably not hang out with people of race A that thought it was not OK to be race B. The internet did its thing and quoted him out of context, and tried to cancel him. He dug in his heels and doubled down. He also liked a certain president that many dislike. And here we are.

[reducesuffering]

> The internet did its thing and quoted him out of context

Let's not act like this is some case of out of context quotes. Here's the actual quote for people to decide for themselves:

"I'm going to back off from being helpful to Black America because it doesn't seem like it pays off. I get called a racist. That's the only outcome. It makes no sense to help Black Americans if you're white. It's over. Don't even think it's worth trying. I'm not saying start a war or do anything bad. Nothing like that. I'm just saying get away. Just get away."

[fsckboy]

>Let's not act like this is some case of out of context quotes. Here's the actual quote for people to decide for themselves:

you quote, but you did not include the context, so your attempt not to be out of context is a fail.

[sfblah]

Also, no one even tries to argue that he's wrong. Does one "race" trying to "help" another ever really "pay off"? Debating that question would actually be pretty interesting.