[mikkupikku]

All images uploaded to twitter, or any other lawful American social media platform, are perceptually hashed and checked against databases of known CSAM. Computer generated pornography, while obviously odious, is not technically illegal in the US. And in either case, twitter has been a dumping ground of such crap for as long as it has existed. In short, with all due respect, get a grip.

[btasker]

All of what you said could be true and it'd *still* be wrong for Grok to be allowed to generate it.

All Musk actually needed to say was "oh fuck, we'll fix that". Instead, he responded with laughing emojiis and nothing's changed.

> is not technically illegal in the US

Bully for you.

X is operating in the UK and it *is* illegal here (and not just here). X can either comply with our laws (and the associated moral standards) or it can cease operating here.

There's weird nerd diving in front of Musk to defend him and then there's defending his AI generating CSAM. Neither's a good look, but one is much worse than the other

[mikkupikku]

Saying that Musk should stop his bot from generating underage waifus is fine and agreeable, but construing that with actual CSAM is plainly manipulative. Of course, the British media has long been known for ""nonce"" hysteria, probably because they know the government and royales are degenerate criminals but don't have the spine to go against the local establishment for it, so instead they redirect that energy in bizarre directions.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=_U-7L1tmBAo

[cjs_ac]

What makes you think this is an appropriate response to someone telling you what's been published in newspapers?

[flumpcakes]

"It's not child porn because AI made it" is quite the take.

And people wonder why the UK introduces all of these bloody laws...

[flumpcakes]

It's still child porn. Now it's child porn that won't match existing hashes! What a great innovation X!

Grok nudifying images of children or woman in replies is not a good thing.