[johnnyanmac]

>It, the difference between calling child pornographic content cp vs CSAM, is splitting hairs.

Yes, and it's a lawyer's job to split hairs. Up thread was talking about legal action so being able distinguish the term changes how you'd attack the issue.

> What help is it in this situation to use CP vs CSAM in that moment. I dont really think it changes things at all.

I just explaied it.

You're free to have your own colloquial opinion on the matter. But if you want to discuss law you need to understand the history on the topic. Especially one as controversial as this. These are probably all tired talking points from before we were born, so while it's novel and insignificant to us, it's language that has made or broken cases in the past. Cases that will be used for precedent.

>So an acronym change on this point to me is still not a great take. Its regressive, not progressive.

I don't really care about the acronym. I'm not a lawyer. A duck is a duck to me.

I'm just explaining why in this legal context the wording does matter. Maybe it shouldn't, but that's not my call.