[ggggffggggg]

> This is somewhat unsurprising, as code review … may not provide immediate value to the person reviewing (or their employer).

If you get “credit” for contributing when you review, maybe people (and even employers, though that is perhaps less likely) would find doing reviews to be more valuable.

Not sure what that looks like; maybe whatever shows up in GitHub is already enough.

[loeg]

Honestly, the same phenomenon is a problem inside companies as well. My employer credits review quality and quantity relatively well (i.e., in annual performance review), but it still isn't a strong enough motivator to really get the rate up to a satisfactory level.