|
|
|
|
|
by dzhiurgis
153 days ago
|
|
> doing cameras plus Lidar At what proportion? Is it mostly lidar or mostly cameras? Or 50/50? > Potentially as extraneous as range to a surface that a camera can’t tell apart from background. I guess yeah for backside of the car you'd probably better off measuring actual actions. How about when you come 4 way stop. LIDAR is useless as it wouldn't recognize anyones turn signals. |
|
eg A driving decision system needs to know object distances AND traffic light colours. It doesn't particularly need to know the source of either. You could have a camera-only system that accurately determines colour and fuzzy-determines distance. Or you could have a LIDAR-only system that accurately determines distance and fuzzy-determines colour.
Or you use both, get accurate LIDAR-distance and accurate camera-colour and skip all the fuzzy-determination steps. Or keep the fuzzy stuff and build a layer of measurement-agreement for redundancy.
So then the question becomes, what's your proportion when deciding whether to stop at a traffic light? Is it mostly light colour or mostly distance to other objects? Or 50/50?
I'd say it's 100/100.