[JKFSOM]

LLMs could absolutely replace Tailwind, and if there was the need, aid creating something better.

[jrm4]

Could?

I'll go a bit further.

I am 100% certain they will.

[sevenseacat]

so why haven't they?

[eadwu]

I think you are expecting some kind of collaborative OSS type of library.

For LLMs to have replaced Tailwind - in part by using it themselves - this does not have mean that there _will_ be another library to reuse. In the context of LLMs, it becomes so "cheap" to customize the webpage that a library is no longer needed.

Tailwind in and of itself can be considered a "highly structured LLM" - if they so took it that far.

[burnt-resistor]

The future will gradually become proprietary and non-textual programming languages, toolchains, and runtimes inaccessible to humans.

[jaapz]

Looking forward to frontpage/dreamweaver levels of css soup already

[george_atom]

is there a need?