[nusl]

I find it ironic that the article is warning against AI use while it uses an AI-made cover image. Surely they find the same fault with copyright issues and AI art? Right?

[tigerBL00D]

There's some irony in that, sure. But at the heart of the matter is privacy. It's about what you input into the chat, not about the output.

[atmosx]

It’s not against AI. It’s against privacy issues arising though data mining & double speech.

[visarga]

> This isn’t just a health assistant. This is infrastructure for a healthcare marketplace.

It's an AI written article IMHO.

[kurtoid]

I interpreted that line as tongue-in-cheek, but on a second reading, I think you're right