[wrxd]

What market share would they have without offering the free tier? Much lower than what they have now, and that would make for a more decentralised and resilient internet

[ITB]

Do you remember how bad things were before CloudFlare? You’d get attacked constantly if you ran a large website.

[pred_]

I remember Tor being significantly more usable, and not having random 3 second delays on websites.

[tick_tock_tick]

> and that would make for a more decentralised and resilient internet

The only people that say that haven't run a site on the open internet in the last decade plus. It's such an ignorant takes it's hard to take anything you say seriously.

[wrxd]

I’m not advocating for having no protections at all. Without Cloudflare giving away protection for free it’s entirely possible that we would have multiple smaller provider offering protection at a fair price so maybe only a smaller fraction of the internet goes offline next time Cloudflare pushes a bad configuration

[Moldoteck]

fair price and europe sounds interesting... regardless it still means your competition will have it easier