[RugnirViking]

The quote from the article continues. You cut it off.

"It was me not really knowing what I was doing, I was trying to protect Leona, or Zoe. I couldn't tell who was screaming."

"My friends were in danger and they [the police] were getting quite hands-on.

"I remember just feeling like I had to help somehow. I would never think to do that to someone, I was just trying to help," he said.

I don't have any opinion on this but I think its important to have the full quote

[flumpcakes]

> "My friends were in danger and they [the police] were getting quite hands-on.

They were petulantly resisting arrest (it looks on camera to scream instead of just complying calmly) while committing destructive/violent crimes. The police were very restrained here. There was no danger from the police, at all.

Now a police officer doing their job has a spinal injury. Palestine Action says they will not stop doing 'direct action' (sabotage, property destruction, violence). They deserve the proscription.

[nanna]

Imagine if they were dealing with the US police...

[amiga386]

> The quote from the article continues. You cut it off.

I quoted three separate snippets from the article that I wanted to draw attention to, and gave you the URL to read the rest yourself.

I'm of the opinion that, someone who sledgehammers an unaware opponent and claims in their defense "I was just trying to help", they are being disingenuous. Especially as one of Britain's most elite and privileged youngsters.

If you'd like to quote more of the article:

> When asked by his barrister Tom Wainwright whether he was willing to injure a person or use violence during the break-in, he replied: "No, not at all".

Read that back to yourself while watching the attack footage again. Is this credible testimony?

[ImPostingOnHN]

Wow, thanks. It was really shameful for amiga386 to intentionally hide that critical context. They even omitted the comma showing that there was additional context (and replaced it with inappropriate snark).