[nomel]

Or, it's that

> we aren't talking about fictional images here, we are talking about photos of real people, many who are children,

is not compatible with what GP actually said

> it's clearly wrong when it concerns actual children

> No living creature was actually hurt when producing these images and cannot be hurt by them.

making these overly dramatic character attacks seem mostly silly

> you completely lack capacity for empathy and you should do some serious self-reflection. This is just a really vile and amoral view to hold.

> Advocating for the freedom to commit that kind of harm against other people is gross, and you should reconsider your views and how much care you have for other people.

And everyone clapped.

[drcongo]

> is not compatible with what GP actually said

GP edited their post to add that after everyone pointed out that that's what the entire thread is actually about and GP realised how disgusting they looked. Keep up.

[nomel]

> GP edited their post to add that

This is false. They only added the "edit: " text, not anything I quoted. I know because I quoted the same in a now-deleted reply before the "edit: " text was added.