|
|
|
|
|
by bentcorner
168 days ago
|
|
It's a balance between allowing linux and (theoretically) opening the door for more cheaters. Saying "players can't play our game because every match has a cheater" is just as bad. I can't say which has more weight but it's not a cut and dry situation, at least until Linux has anti-cheat. Right now developers could make an "unattested" queue for linux and other non-TPM windows systems. Which could also serve as a black-hole for cheaters, so maybe there's some value in that. |
|