[ThrowawayB7]

> "They have since lost this dominance to Google"

A lot of which had to do with being under a consent decree.

> "When Mobile came along, Microsoft completely missed."

By "missed" you mean that MS was at the top of the mobile phone heap after defeating Palm Computing when the iPhone came out and swept Windows Mobile, Palm, Research In Motion and everyone else away.

[_heimdall]

I expect the GP was referring to missing the boat in responding to the iPhone after it swept away Windows Mobile.

Microsoft was late to respond, eventually bought Danger and released the Kin phone before cancelling it within weeks, and only released Windows Phone in 2010 a solid 3 years after the iPhone release.

Windows Phone was actually pretty nice to use, but they were already too late to the scene and didn't have a chance to steal ground from iPhone or android who already had solid app ecosystems.

[ThrowawayB7]

That still isn't missing the boat. The pivot to the improved UI in Windows Mobile 6.5, the last of the old school Windows CE based releases, and skins by OEMs like HTC was IIRC in response to the iPhone's successful UI innovations.

And let's not forget that Google specifically interfered with access to their services on Windows Phone to hamstring it.

[Spooky23]

Huh? MS did ok in the nascent consumer market. RIM owned commercial, completely.

I had an iPaq in 2004 when we got married. It was like living in the future, where the future was a scaled down Windows 98 box. We took a one month road trip and was able to Priceline hotels on the road as we explored. Amazing device but not an iPhone.

Ballmer was so butthurt about iPhone he would berate people who appeared before him with one. As a customer, my boss and I were invited to a meeting with high level Microsoft people and asked to not carry iPhones out of respect.